-
Posts
-
It had to do with the politics of the kingdom of good, not the kingdom of God.
You raise a good point, Bonita. The Jews sought a different kind of ‘saviour’, one that would deliver a political kingdom. When in fact Jesus offered only a Spiritual Kingdom with “the bread of life for your hungry souls”. 153:2.9 (1711.1)
121:2.8 (1334.2) …This fortuitous liberty and independence of the political rule of surrounding and more powerful peoples the Jews attributed to the fact that they were the “chosen people,” to the direct interposition of Yahweh. Such an attitude of racial superiority made it all the harder for them to endure Roman suzerainty when it finally fell upon their land. But even in that sad hour the Jews refused to learn that their world mission was spiritual, not political.
134:4.10 (1487.7) …There can be no lasting religious peace on Urantia until all religious groups freely surrender all their notions of divine favor, chosen people, and religious sovereignty. Only when God the Father becomes supreme will men become religious brothers and live together in religious peace on earth.
Carrying on from Bonita’s quote above:
153:2.7 (1710.5) “My brethren, hanker not after the meat which perishes but rather seek for the spiritual food that nourishes even to eternal life; and this is the bread of life which the Son gives to all who will take it and eat, for the Father has given the Son this life without measure. And when you asked me, ‘What must we do to perform the works of God?’ I plainly told you: ‘This is the work of God, that you believe him whom he has sent.’”
The more closely man approaches God through love, the greater the reality — actuality — of that man. 117:4.14 (1285.3)
Yes Bonita, the ‘chosen people’ concept is undoubtedly responsible for much of the world’s problems, whether it be based on religion, race, culture, or political persuasion. This is why the world needs “the religion of Jesus”…..and this is very much what Paper 170 is about! The gospel, or good news of the kingdom is the religion of Jesus.
The manifestations associated with the bestowal of the “new teacher,” and the reception of the apostles’ preaching by the men of various races and nations gathered together at Jerusalem, indicate the universality of the religion of Jesus. The gospel of the kingdom was to be identified with no particular race, culture, or language. This day of Pentecost witnessed the great effort of the spirit to liberate the religion of Jesus from its inherited Jewish fetters. Even after this demonstration of pouring out the spirit upon all flesh, the apostles at first endeavored to impose the requirements of Judaism upon their converts. Even Paul had trouble with his Jerusalem brethren because he refused to subject the gentiles to these Jewish practices. No revealed religion can spread to all the world when it makes the serious mistake of becoming permeated with some national culture or associated with established racial, social, or economic practices. P.2064:1
The simplicity of this good news is what makes the human ego baulk at acceptance. And yet it has power beyond what we can imagine!
The religion of Jesus is the most powerful unifying influence the world has ever known. P.2065:5
Religion is now confronted by the challenge of a new age of scientific minds and materialistic tendencies. In this gigantic struggle between the secular and the spiritual, the religion of Jesus will eventually triumph. P.2075:3
(1860.2) 170:2.7 6. Jesus taught that eternal realities were the result (reward) of righteous earthly striving. Man’s mortal sojourn on earth acquired new meanings consequent upon the recognition of a noble destiny.
I love this quote. Eternal realities are the reward for righteous striving while living this earthly life. Many believe that eternal realities are a reward for good works, or for winning converts, or for killing infidels; but Jesus said it is for striving, striving for righteousness. Striving for righteousness simply means earnestly attempting to live according to the will of God. We may fall short, but the striving itself has lasting value. It’s all about the desire for perfection; it’s the soul’s desire that pulls us Godward. The desire of the soul is an endless prayer, a ceaseless communion, a devoted loyalty to Deity.
3. In Relation to Righteousness
(1861.8) 170:3.1 Jesus was always trying to impress upon his apostles and disciples that they must acquire, by faith, a righteousness which would exceed the righteousness of slavish works which some of the scribes and Pharisees paraded so vaingloriously before the world.
(1861.9) 170:3.2 Though Jesus taught that faith, simple childlike belief, is the key to the door of the kingdom, he also taught that, having entered the door, there are the progressive steps of righteousness which every believing child must ascend in order to grow up to the full stature of the robust sons of God.
(1861.10) 170:3.3 It is in the consideration of the technique of receiving God’s forgiveness that the attainment of the righteousness of the kingdom is revealed. Faith is the price you pay for entrance into the family of God; but forgiveness is the act of God which accepts your faith as the price of admission. And the reception of the forgiveness of God by a kingdom believer involves a definite and actual experience and consists in the following four steps, the kingdom steps of inner righteousness:
(1862.1) 170:3.4 1. God’s forgiveness is made actually available and is personally experienced by man just in so far as he forgives his fellows.
(1862.2) 170:3.5 2. Man will not truly forgive his fellows unless he loves them as himself.
(1862.3) 170:3.6 3. To thus love your neighbor as yourself is the highest ethics.
(1862.4) 170:3.7 4. Moral conduct, true righteousness, becomes, then, the natural result of such love.
(1862.5) 170:3.8 It therefore is evident that the true and inner religion of the kingdom unfailingly and increasingly tends to manifest itself in practical avenues of social service. Jesus taught a living religion that impelled its believers to engage in the doing of loving service. But Jesus did not put ethics in the place of religion. He taught religion as a cause and ethics as a result.
(1862.6) 170:3.9 The righteousness of any act must be measured by the motive; the highest forms of good are therefore unconscious. Jesus was never concerned with morals or ethics as such. He was wholly concerned with that inward and spiritual fellowship with God the Father which so certainly and directly manifests itself as outward and loving service for man. He taught that the religion of the kingdom is a genuine personal experience which no man can contain within himself; that the consciousness of being a member of the family of believers leads inevitably to the practice of the precepts of the family conduct, the service of one’s brothers and sisters in the effort to enhance and enlarge the brotherhood.
(1862.7) 170:3.10 The religion of the kingdom is personal, individual; the fruits, the results, are familial, social. Jesus never failed to exalt the sacredness of the individual as contrasted with the community. But he also recognized that man develops his character by unselfish service; that he unfolds his moral nature in loving relations with his fellows.
(1862.8) 170:3.11 By teaching that the kingdom is within, by exalting the individual, Jesus struck the deathblow of the old society in that he ushered in the new dispensation of true social righteousness. This new order of society the world has little known because it has refused to practice the principles of the gospel of the kingdom of heaven. And when this kingdom of spiritual pre-eminence does come upon the earth, it will not be manifested in mere improved social and material conditions, but rather in the glories of those enhanced and enriched spiritual values which are characteristic of the approaching age of improved human relations and advancing spiritual attainments.
It is in the consideration of the technique of receiving God’s forgiveness that the attainment of the righteousness of the kingdom is revealed. Faith is the price you pay for entrance into the family of God; but forgiveness is the act of God which accepts your faith as the price of admission.
This is an interesting quote. God’s forgiveness is what enables us to enter the kingdom, to attain true righteousness. What is God forgiving? Our mistakes (errors), acts of evil, sins? Can anyone shine some light on this for me?
The expression which illuminates the brightest for me is the word “sincerity”. This is coupled with “faith”. This involves directly the relationship that we seek to augment with our fragment of the Father. If we consider: 170:3.10 (1862.7) The religion of the kingdom is personal, individual; the fruits, the results, are familial, social. Then it is by our Godlike qualities arrived at through our sincere, genuine and honest call for guidance in every action, from our Father Fragment, that bears fruit in our interactions with others.
So to address your question, Julian. Many would suggest that forgiveness was given with the bestowal of the Spirit of Truth. I disagree with the “automatic forgiveness”. My personal view is that we are told: 103:2.1 (1130.6) You do not enter the kingdom of heaven unless you have been “born again” — born of the Spirit.
This would suggest a very personal, individual responsibility to promulgate a mind open to guidance and to hunger for Truth that would bring us closer to God-consciousness, righteousness. I don’t think “forgiveness” is related to sin, so much as it is related to our past failure to have faith and to sincerely seek the Kingdom within — It is only then that we receive “forgiveness” and are “born of the spirit”.
The more closely man approaches God through love, the greater the reality — actuality — of that man. 117:4.14 (1285.3)
4. Jesus’ Teaching about the Kingdom
(1862.9) 170:4.1 Jesus never gave a precise definition of the kingdom. At one time he would discourse on one phase of the kingdom, and at another time he would discuss a different aspect of the brotherhood of God’s reign in the hearts of men. In the course of this Sabbath afternoon’s sermon Jesus noted no less than five phases, or epochs, of the kingdom, and they were:
(1862.10) 170:4.2 1. The personal and inward experience of the spiritual life of the fellowship of the individual believer with God the Father.
(1863.1) 170:4.3 2. The enlarging brotherhood of gospel believers, the social aspects of the enhanced morals and quickened ethics resulting from the reign of God’s spirit in the hearts of individual believers.
(1863.2) 170:4.4 3. The supermortal brotherhood of invisible spiritual beings which prevails on earth and in heaven, the superhuman kingdom of God.
(1863.3) 170:4.5 4. The prospect of the more perfect fulfillment of the will of God, the advance toward the dawn of a new social order in connection with improved spiritual living — the next age of man.
(1863.4) 170:4.6 5. The kingdom in its fullness, the future spiritual age of light and life on earth.
(1863.5) 170:4.7 Wherefore must we always examine the Master’s teaching to ascertain which of these five phases he may have reference to when he makes use of the term kingdom of heaven. By this process of gradually changing man’s will and thus affecting human decisions, Michael and his associates are likewise gradually but certainly changing the entire course of human evolution, social and otherwise.
(1863.6) 170:4.8 The Master on this occasion placed emphasis on the following five points as representing the cardinal features of the gospel of the kingdom:
(1863.7) 170:4.9 1. The pre-eminence of the individual.
(1863.8) 170:4.10 2. The will as the determining factor in man’s experience.
(1863.9) 170:4.11 3. Spiritual fellowship with God the Father.
(1863.10) 170:4.12 4. The supreme satisfactions of the loving service of man.
(1863.11) 170:4.13 5. The transcendency of the spiritual over the material in human personality.
(1863.12) 170:4.14 This world has never seriously or sincerely or honestly tried out these dynamic ideas and divine ideals of Jesus’ doctrine of the kingdom of heaven. But you should not become discouraged by the apparently slow progress of the kingdom idea on Urantia. Remember that the order of progressive evolution is subjected to sudden and unexpected periodical changes in both the material and the spiritual worlds. The bestowal of Jesus as an incarnated Son was just such a strange and unexpected event in the spiritual life of the world. Neither make the fatal mistake, in looking for the age manifestation of the kingdom, of failing to effect its establishment within your own souls.
(1863.13) 170:4.15 Although Jesus referred one phase of the kingdom to the future and did, on numerous occasions, intimate that such an event might appear as a part of a world crisis; and though he did likewise most certainly, on several occasions, definitely promise sometime to return to Urantia, it should be recorded that he never positively linked these two ideas together. He promised a new revelation of the kingdom on earth and at some future time; he also promised sometime to come back to this world in person; but he did not say that these two events were synonymous. From all we know these promises may, or may not, refer to the same event.
(1863.14) 170:4.16 His apostles and disciples most certainly linked these two teachings together. When the kingdom failed to materialize as they had expected, recalling the Master’s teaching concerning a future kingdom and remembering his promise to come again, they jumped to the conclusion that these promises referred to an identical event; and therefore they lived in hope of his immediate second coming to establish the kingdom in its fullness and with power and glory. And so have successive believing generations lived on earth entertaining the same inspiring but disappointing hope.
It is in the consideration of the technique of receiving God’s forgiveness that the attainment of the righteousness of the kingdom is revealed. Faith is the price you pay for entrance into the family of God; but forgiveness is the act of God which accepts your faith as the price of admission.This is an interesting quote. God’s forgiveness is what enables us to enter the kingdom, to attain true righteousness. What is God forgiving? Our mistakes (errors), acts of evil, sins? Can anyone shine some light on this for me?Entrance into the kingdom is by faith and faith alone. Righteousness is revealed after entering the kingdom. The key word there is “revealed”. The “steps of righteousness” are progressively revealed within the kingdom as a function of perfecting character.So, we enter the kingdom by our desire for perfection. The process of striving for perfection requires a commitment of loyalty to Deity. Anything that breaks, hinders, inhibits, ignores, delays or interferes with that commitment of loyalty will require forgiveness. Forgiveness comes as part of the return to loyalty relations with Deity, a return to sincere striving to become Godlike. Upon entering the kingdom we take a loyalty oath to always strive with a whole heart to do God’s will. God’s will is to share his love once it is discovered and recognized. Forgiveness is only necessary when we play games with the oath, and our awareness of being forgiven becomes obvious to us once we reestablish personality relations and go back to sharing.89:10.2 Sin must be redefined as deliberate disloyalty to Deity. There are degrees of disloyalty: the partial loyalty of indecision; the divided loyalty of confliction; the dying loyalty of indifference; and the death of loyalty exhibited in devotion to godless ideals.
89:10.6 The forgiveness of sin by Deity is the renewal of loyalty relations following a period of the human consciousness of the lapse of such relations as the consequence of conscious rebellion. The forgiveness does not have to be sought, only received as the consciousness of re-establishment of loyalty relations between the creature and the Creator. And all the loyal sons of God are happy, service-loving, and ever-progressive in the Paradise ascent.
Righteous is not automatic, it requires a decision to outwork the Father’s inner love. If you bottle that work up in any way, you’re not doing his will, you have broken the loyalty oath by not carrying through from inner discovery and recognition to outer decision and action. The Father’s love must be allowed to go full circuit outward, and that is how forgiveness is revealed, by striving to keep the great circuit of love in perpetual motion. This great circuit of love is the revealer of righteousness, which is simply the expression of the fruits of the spirit in the life of the kingdom dweller, the outworking of the discovery of the Father’s love within the soul.21:3.14 Virtue is volitional with personality; righteousness is not automatic in freewill creatures.150:5.5 In summing up his final statement, Jesus said: “You cannot buy salvation; you cannot earn righteousness. Salvation is the gift of God, and righteousness is the natural fruit of the spirit-born life of sonship in the kingdom. You are not to be saved because you live a righteous life; rather is it that you live a righteous life because you have already been saved, have recognized sonship as the gift of God and service in the kingdom as the supreme delight of life on earth. When men believe this gospel, which is a revelation of the goodness of God, they will be led to voluntary repentance of all known sin. Realization of sonship is incompatible with the desire to sin. Kingdom believers hunger for righteousness and thirst for divine perfection.”117:6.10 All true love is from God, and man receives the divine affection as he himself bestows this love upon his fellows. Love is dynamic. It can never be captured; it is alive, free, thrilling, and always moving. Man can never take the love of the Father and imprison it within his heart. The Father’s love can become real to mortal man only by passing through that man’s personality as he in turn bestows this love upon his fellows. The great circuit of love is from the Father, through sons to brothers, and hence to the Supreme. The love of the Father appears in the mortal personality by the ministry of the indwelling Adjuster. Such a God-knowing son reveals this love to his universe brethren, and this fraternal affection is the essence of the love of the Supreme.
Dear Angela and Bonita,
Thank you both for responding so graciously to my question. You have truly helped me to gain a clearer understanding of what it means to enter the kingdom and attain the righteousness thereof! I can certainly see that I need God’s forgiveness.
(1861.2) 170:2.20 Jesus taught that, by faith, the believer enters the kingdom now. In the various discourses he taught that two things are essential to faith-entrance into the kingdom:
(1861.3) 170:2.21 1. Faith, sincerity. To come as a little child, to receive the bestowal of sonship as a gift; to submit to the doing of the Father’s will without questioning and in the full confidence and genuine trustfulness of the Father’s wisdom; to come into the kingdom free from prejudice and preconception; to be open-minded and teachable like an unspoiled child. (1861.4)
170:2.22 2. Truth hunger. The thirst for righteousness, a change of mind, the acquirement of the motive to be like God and to find God.
Here’s one of my favorites, regarding this hunger and thirst. The believer has but one battle: to fight the good fight of faith.
159:3:8 The world is filled with hungry souls who famish in the very presence of the bread of life; men die searching for the very God who lives within them. Men seek for the treasures of the kingdom with yearning hearts and weary feet when they are all within the immediate grasp of living faith. Faith is to religion what sails are to a ship; it is an addition of power, not an added burden of life. There is but one struggle for those who enter the kingdom, and that is to fight the good fight of faith. The believer has only one battle, and that is against doubt — unbelief.5. Later Ideas of the Kingdom
(1864.1) 170:5.1 Having summarized the teachings of Jesus about the kingdom of heaven, we are permitted to narrate certain later ideas which became attached to the concept of the kingdom and to engage in a prophetic forecast of the kingdom as it may evolve in the age to come.
(1864.2) 170:5.2 Throughout the first centuries of the Christian propaganda, the idea of the kingdom of heaven was tremendously influenced by the then rapidly spreading notions of Greek idealism, the idea of the natural as the shadow of the spiritual — the temporal as the time shadow of the eternal.
(1864.3) 170:5.3 But the great step which marked the transplantation of the teachings of Jesus from a Jewish to a gentile soil was taken when the Messiah of the kingdom became the Redeemer of the church, a religious and social organization growing out of the activities of Paul and his successors and based on the teachings of Jesus as they were supplemented by the ideas of Philo and the Persian doctrines of good and evil.
(1864.4) 170:5.4 The ideas and ideals of Jesus, embodied in the teaching of the gospel of the kingdom, nearly failed of realization as his followers progressively distorted his pronouncements. The Master’s concept of the kingdom was notably modified by two great tendencies:
(1864.5) 170:5.5 1. The Jewish believers persisted in regarding him as the Messiah. They believed that Jesus would very soon return actually to establish the world-wide and more or less material kingdom.
(1864.6) 170:5.6 2. The gentile Christians began very early to accept the doctrines of Paul, which led increasingly to the general belief that Jesus was the Redeemer of the children of the church, the new and institutional successor of the earlier concept of the purely spiritual brotherhood of the kingdom.
(1864.7) 170:5.7 The church, as a social outgrowth of the kingdom, would have been wholly natural and even desirable. The evil of the church was not its existence, but rather that it almost completely supplanted the Jesus concept of the kingdom. Paul’s institutionalized church became a virtual substitute for the kingdom of heaven which Jesus had proclaimed.
(1864.8) 170:5.8 But doubt not, this same kingdom of heaven which the Master taught exists within the heart of the believer, will yet be proclaimed to this Christian church, even as to all other religions, races, and nations on earth — even to every individual.
(1864.9) 170:5.9 The kingdom of Jesus’ teaching, the spiritual ideal of individual righteousness and the concept of man’s divine fellowship with God, became gradually submerged into the mystic conception of the person of Jesus as the Redeemer-Creator and spiritual head of a socialized religious community. In this way a formal and institutional church became the substitute for the individually spirit-led brotherhood of the kingdom.
(1864.10) 170:5.10 The church was an inevitable and useful social result of Jesus’ life and teachings; the tragedy consisted in the fact that this social reaction to the teachings of the kingdom so fully displaced the spiritual concept of the real kingdom as Jesus taught and lived it.
(1865.1) 170:5.11 The kingdom, to the Jews, was the Israelite community; to the gentiles it became the Christian church. To Jesus the kingdom was the sum of those individuals who had confessed their faith in the fatherhood of God, thereby declaring their wholehearted dedication to the doing of the will of God, thus becoming members of the spiritual brotherhood of man.
(1865.2) 170:5.12 The Master fully realized that certain social results would appear in the world as a consequence of the spread of the gospel of the kingdom; but he intended that all such desirable social manifestations should appear as unconscious and inevitable outgrowths, or natural fruits, of this inner personal experience of individual believers, this purely spiritual fellowship and communion with the divine spirit which indwells and activates all such believers.
(1865.3) 170:5.13 Jesus foresaw that a social organization, or church, would follow the progress of the true spiritual kingdom, and that is why he never opposed the apostles’ practicing the rite of John’s baptism. He taught that the truth-loving soul, the one who hungers and thirsts for righteousness, for God, is admitted by faith to the spiritual kingdom; at the same time the apostles taught that such a believer is admitted to the social organization of disciples by the outward rite of baptism.
(1865.4) 170:5.14 When Jesus’ immediate followers recognized their partial failure to realize his ideal of the establishment of the kingdom in the hearts of men by the spirit’s domination and guidance of the individual believer, they set about to save his teaching from being wholly lost by substituting for the Master’s ideal of the kingdom the gradual creation of a visible social organization, the Christian church. And when they had accomplished this program of substitution, in order to maintain consistency and to provide for the recognition of the Master’s teaching regarding the fact of the kingdom, they proceeded to set the kingdom off into the future. The church, just as soon as it was well established, began to teach that the kingdom was in reality to appear at the culmination of the Christian age, at the second coming of Christ.
(1865.5) 170:5.15 In this manner the kingdom became the concept of an age, the idea of a future visitation, and the ideal of the final redemption of the saints of the Most High. The early Christians (and all too many of the later ones) generally lost sight of the Father-and-son idea embodied in Jesus’ teaching of the kingdom, while they substituted therefor the well-organized social fellowship of the church. The church thus became in the main a social brotherhood which effectively displaced Jesus’ concept and ideal of a spiritualbrotherhood.
(1865.6) 170:5.16 Jesus’ ideal concept largely failed, but upon the foundation of the Master’s personal life and teachings, supplemented by the Greek and Persian concepts of eternal life and augmented by Philo’s doctrine of the temporal contrasted with the spiritual, Paul went forth to build up one of the most progressive human societies which has ever existed on Urantia.
(1865.7) 170:5.17 The concept of Jesus is still alive in the advanced religions of the world. Paul’s Christian church is the socialized and humanized shadow of what Jesus intended the kingdom of heaven to be — and what it most certainly will yet become. Paul and his successors partly transferred the issues of eternal life from the individual to the church. Christ thus became the head of the church rather than the elder brother of each individual believer in the Father’s family of the kingdom. Paul and his contemporaries applied all of Jesus’ spiritual implications regarding himself and the individual believer to the church as a group of believers; and in doing this, they struck a deathblow to Jesus’ concept of the divine kingdom in the heart of the individual believer.
(1866.1) 170:5.18 And so, for centuries, the Christian church has labored under great embarrassment because it dared to lay claim to those mysterious powers and privileges of the kingdom, powers and privileges which can be exercised and experienced only between Jesus and his spiritual believer brothers. And thus it becomes apparent that membership in the church does not necessarily mean fellowship in the kingdom; one is spiritual, the other mainly social.
(1866.2) 170:5.19 Sooner or later another and greater John the Baptist is due to arise proclaiming “the kingdom of God is at hand” — meaning a return to the high spiritual concept of Jesus, who proclaimed that the kingdom is the will of his heavenly Father dominant and transcendent in the heart of the believer — and doing all this without in any way referring either to the visible church on earth or to the anticipated second coming of Christ. There must come a revival of the actual teachings of Jesus, such a restatement as will undo the work of his early followers who went about to create a sociophilosophical system of belief regarding the fact of Michael’s sojourn on earth. In a short time the teaching of this story about Jesus nearly supplanted the preaching of Jesus’ gospel of the kingdom. In this way a historical religion displaced that teaching in which Jesus had blended man’s highest moral ideas and spiritual ideals with man’s most sublime hope for the future — eternal life. And that was the gospel of the kingdom.
(1866.3) 170:5.20 It is just because the gospel of Jesus was so many-sided that within a few centuries students of the records of his teachings became divided up into so many cults and sects. This pitiful subdivision of Christian believers results from failure to discern in the Master’s manifold teachings the divine oneness of his matchless life. But someday the true believers in Jesus will not be thus spiritually divided in their attitude before unbelievers. Always we may have diversity of intellectual comprehension and interpretation, even varying degrees of socialization, but lack of spiritual brotherhood is both inexcusable and reprehensible.
(1866.4) 170:5.21 Mistake not! there is in the teachings of Jesus an eternal nature which will not permit them forever to remain unfruitful in the hearts of thinking men. The kingdom as Jesus conceived it has to a large extent failed on earth; for the time being, an outward church has taken its place; but you should comprehend that this church is only the larval stage of the thwarted spiritual kingdom, which will carry it through this material age and over into a more spiritual dispensation where the Master’s teachings may enjoy a fuller opportunity for development. Thus does the so-called Christian church become the cocoon in which the kingdom of Jesus’ concept now slumbers. The kingdom of the divine brotherhood is still alive and will eventually and certainly come forth from this long submergence, just as surely as the butterfly eventually emerges as the beautiful unfolding of its less attractive creature of metamorphic development.
(1864.8) 170:5.8 But doubt not, this same kingdom of heaven which the Master taught exists within the heart of the believer, will yet be proclaimed to this Christian church, even as to all other religions, races, and nations on earth — even to every individual.
I wonder how this will happen? Who will proclaim this true gospel of the kingdom to the Christian church and the rest of the world?
(1866.2) 170:5.19 Sooner or later another and greater John the Baptist is due to arise proclaiming “the kingdom of God is at hand” — meaning a return to the high spiritual concept of Jesus, who proclaimed that the kingdom is the will of his heavenly Father dominant and transcendent in the heart of the believer — and doing all this without in any way referring either to the visible church on earth or to the anticipated second coming of Christ.
Is this the answer….”another and greater John the Baptist”? If so, then is he an individual or a composite group? And what does this mean for us!….students and readers of the 5th epochal revelation…..which contains within it’s pages the 4th epochal revelation, the religion of Jesus. I would be interested in and would truly welcome your views and comments on these questions.
Dear Julian and everyone contributing and listening in…
so good to see that the online gathering has come together. I have traveled over the weekend to meet up with readers of the Sydney area Study Group. Always a special event!
We also touched on some of the points you have mentioned in your discussions. About forgiveness someone had an interesting approach – the meaning of the word when you look at it etymologically – afor (before) giving .
I think – we find it hard when trying to understand our fellows or a situation before we can ‘forgive’ a hurt that was caused. The divine giving is different. It’s a bit like the space we enter by faith – it’s already there, prepared, promised – but as we learn, only by our act of forgiving others can we truly realize this given-ness (gift) – this reality of being in the kingdom – and enter therein.
Also – this sentence is quite a shake-up.
(1863.12) 170:4.14 This world has never seriously or sincerely or honestly tried out these dynamic ideas and divine ideals of Jesus’ doctrine of the kingdom of heaven.
We – the world – have never really tried this model of living, promoted and demonstrated by Jesus – seriously enough, because if we had things would be different!!
May we ever thirst and hunger for that righteousness that makes us seriously seeking to better ourselves to grow in grace and strength. May you all – dear siblings -have a wonderful week ahead and live joyfully.
Rita
Bonita, you dive into the depths and extract pearls of wisdom!
I am rather envious (is that a sin?) of the opportunities the Study Group meetings present. Such a wonderful experience to sit with others and discuss at length. It makes me wonder whether such groups are the beginnings of the Brotherhood of Men. If only we could do more than ‘talk’ the teachings through this Foundation. But we are told the promulgation is a gradual process.
Julian, my first most vivid memories as a very young child are of my Grandmother’s vegetable garden in Launceston and experiencing the delicious taste of raspberries for the first time as I carefully picked them from among the “prickles”.
Is this the answer….”another and greater John the Baptist”? If so, then is he an individual or a composite group? And what does this mean for us!
I dare to believe this is a literal reference to an individual who will have widespread influence in the acceptance of the Urantia Book and who will speed our progress towards the Brotherhood of Man. Ironically, I think the role served (this time) will be to precede the second coming and to inspire a foundation for reception in a similar fashion to the role served by the original John the Baptist. “Greater” because the words spoken will be inspired by revelation.
The more closely man approaches God through love, the greater the reality — actuality — of that man. 117:4.14 (1285.3)
Ironically, I think the role served (this time) will be to precede the second coming and to inspire a foundation for reception in a similar fashion to the role served by the original John the Baptist. “Greater” because the words spoken will be inspired by revelation.
Your contribution is much appreciated Angela! My reading of the pertinent passage gave me the understanding that whoever the “another and greater than John the Baptist” is, he or she (or they) would arise to proclaim “the actual teachings of Jesus” in order to undo the damage done by the Christian church, paving the way for “a more spiritual dispensation where the Master’s teachings may enjoy a fuller opportunity for development.” This dispensation would seem to me to occur long before the Master’s second coming.
(1866.2) 170:5.19 Sooner or later another and greater John the Baptist is due to arise proclaiming “the kingdom of God is at hand” — meaning a return to the high spiritual concept of Jesus, who proclaimed that the kingdom is the will of his heavenly Father dominant and transcendent in the heart of the believer — and doing all this without in any way referring either to the visible church on earth or to the anticipated second coming of Christ.
….but you should comprehend that this church is only the larval stage of the thwarted spiritual kingdom, which will carry it through this material age and over into a more spiritual dispensation where the Master’s teachings may enjoy a fuller opportunity for development.
Login to reply to this topic.
Not registered? Sign up here.